This week I want to do something a little different jerseys
Brian’s article Ethical Justification for Terrorism is sure to raise the hackles of those with a conservative bent. Although he’s not the first to take up thorny issue of examining the difference between terrorism and freedom fighting—even I have written about it—his is one of the more intelligent articles on the subject. Brian visits this issue from a unique perspective that seriously ponders whether tnfl jerseys cheaperrorism is ever ethically justifiable. Many, if not most, of the literature on this topic merely tries to prove a point by making comparisons between such things as America’s fight for independence and the acts of Islamic terrorists. (I myself have done this.) Brian goes beyond this to force us to ask notmlb jerseys only can certain comparisons be made, but whether conditions can ever become severe enough to justify the use of terrorism. If you are particularly firm in your belief that the answer to that question is no, then I urgently request you read his article. You just may find yourself questioning your commitment to that belief. In On the Question of National Healthcare and Insurance in the United States Brian published an exhaustively comprehensive overview of the failings of the American health care system. I would suggest that Senate Majority leader—and medical doctor—Bill Frnba jerseysist should be required to read this, but alas he’s too busy with that other major problem facing Americans: allowing law-abiding homosexuals to get married. The brilliance of this piece lies in how Brian makes his case from a variety of arguments. It’s a long piece—seven pages plus a bibliography page—but Brian makes terrific use of length. He makes his case using both statistical data and ideology. I do not feel is it my job in this column only to spotlight those writers with whom I am in agreement. Again, let me reiterate that I do not share Melissa’s political viewpoint, but I know there are plenty of visitors to Associated Content who would find a kindred soul in her. She writes for a specific audience and I think it would be a shame for her if that audience didn’t know she was there. A perfect example of Melissa’s writing was published last week, titled "Official English" is Not "English Only". Melissa is vehemently and defiantly anti-leftist in ghd straightenersher stance and this article is an example of Melissa writing at her take-no-prisoners ranting best. If you are the type of person who agrees with such sentiments as the US has been “invaded by twelve million illegal aliens” or still remain convinced that Jane Fonda is a communist insurgent despite being one of the richest women in America then Melissa is where you want to go next. This week I want to do something a little different. Instead of spotlighting individual opinion pieces published this week, I want to draw attention to an aspect of Associated Content I feel deserves special merit. One of the greatest things about this site is that they don’t take sides. Any political opinion whatever can and probably has been published here. Of course, I have no idea whether any politicacheap nfl jerseysl piece has been rejected on the grounds that it could be considered offensive or dangerous, but I do know that radical opinions from both the left and right are consistently published here. As far as I’m concerned Associated Content is becoming a beacon to both readers and writers of all political persuasions. That is why I have chosen to spotlight just two content producers in this column. One represents the far left and the other represents the far right. The differences between them, however, go beyond that. I know that I will be subject to allegations that I am favoring the writer from the left. And I admit it. I also admit I’m an unabashed liberal. That being said, I fully suspect that any critique I may make of the conservative writer will be taken as nothing less than a ringing endorsemnfl jerseysent of her points of view by a large segment of Associated Content visitors. In essence, I feel that taking a critical view of the writer with whom I disagree will do her much more good than harm because most of those who will actively search this writer out will probably be people who are also deterred from reading the writer from the left precisely because I believe he is right.